Gay Marriage Should Be Legal - 925 Words

Gay Marriage jenisea Phoenix Community College Gay Marriage What if you met someone and fell deep in love? What if they meant everything in the world to you? Wouldn’t you do whatever it takes to make them happy? What if i told you that you couldn’t? and that no matter how much you showed someone that you are meant to be that you couldn’t marry them? Wouldn’t that tear you apart inside?. â€Å"The Human Rights Campaign Foundation states that 4 - 10 young people live in a community that doesn’t except them or who they choose to love†( as cited in HRC.org 2014). Gay Marriage should be legal in all states and it should be allowed the same benefits of hetroexual marriage,because This central idea of traditional marriage is inaccurate ,everyone should have the chance to marry who they love, and stable gay marriage homes benefits adoption practices worldwide. First , This central idea of traditional marriage is inaccurate, being defined as just between man and woman,but even dating back to ancient times there is no such thing as a traditional marriage. â€Å"Ross Douthat stated there is polygamy, mistresses, and the use of prostitution in some marriages so the whole hetrosexual monogamy as a whole can be considered as â€Å"unnatural† in modern terms† (as cited in NYTimes.com 2014),but as you can see there are imperfections in every relationship.Secondly, the most important reason Gay Marriage should be be legalShow MoreRelatedGay Marriage Should Be Legal1205 Words   |  5 PagesHoward Sociology 1301-93431 Gay Marriage Getting married is something that most people do when they find love, which it is an important event in their life. The GLBT (gay, lesbian, bisexual and transgender) community now get the legal right of same-sex marriage, which they have fought for throughout the years; on the other h and, some opponents of same-sex marriage have called for a constitutional change towards it. Although there were some countries that allowed gay marriage before the United StatesRead MoreGay Marriage Should Be Legal1159 Words   |  5 PagesAmendment, which puts a ban on gay marriage. This amendment entitles to equal rights to the gay community, ending toleration of discrimination in jobs, rights protecting gays from hate crimes,rights allowing advancement in government. However, the concept of gay marriage is still not considered a right the American people should extend to homosexuals. II. The vast majority of opponents believe marriage should be between one woman and one man, meaning marriage should be between members of the oppositeRead MoreGay Marriage Should Be Legal1574 Words   |  7 Pagesequal rights. Gays and lesbians are consistently denied rights that are typically taken for granted by the average American. Specifically, gay and lesbian couples are denied the right to marry even if they are outstanding citizens. They are held at an unfair disadvantage solely because of their sexual orientation. This discrimination must stop, because gay and lesbian couples are law-abiding citizens too, who should be afforded the same rights as heterosexual couples. Marriage is about love andRead MoreGay Marriage Should Be Legal1564 Words   |  7 PagesWhat is marriage? Recently, people argue with respect to the definition of marriage. What happened to marriage? To get married is a very important event for almost everyone. Especially for women, marriage and giv ing a birth could be the two biggest events of their lives. Many people believe that getting married to the one whom he or she loves is natural. However, what do you think if you cannot get married to him or her because it is socially unacceptable? 100 years ago different colored peopleRead MoreShould Gay Marriage Be Legal?778 Words   |  3 PagesShould Gay Marriage Be Legal? â€Å"†¦I now pronounce you husband and wife†¦Ã¢â‚¬  One would normally hear this when attending a wedding. In tradition marriage has been between one male and one female who love each other. But how would one feel if they heard â€Å"I now pronounce you groom and groom† or how about â€Å"†¦bride and bride...†? In the last 50 years the number of same-sex couples has increased. The on-going argument between the government and the people is â€Å"Should gay marriage be legal?† Although some sayRead MoreGay Marriage Should Be Legal1126 Words   |  5 PagesJune 26, 2015 for gay marriage to be legal in all fifty states, thirty seven out of the fifty and Washington D.C already legalized gay marriage. Many support gay marriage and many do not, with widespread values and reasons for and against it. Due to religion and rights people across the nation have differing views and opinions of it.In a five to four vote in the Supreme Court gay marriage becam e legalized in all fifty states. Shortly after that a few marriage officiators and marriage licenses peopleRead MoreGay Marriage Should Be Legal1179 Words   |  5 PagesGAY MARRIAGES Some states such as Iowa legalized gay marriage through the action of judicial interpretation based on the state’s constitutional stipulations while other states such as Vermont legalized gay marriage through legislation initiatives. These cases demonstrate the government is the sole body that can dictate the validity of whatever is to be regarded as a marriage, and in this case gay marriage. The power to validate marriage is still observed among the private citizens, religious institutionsRead MoreThe Gay Marriage Should Be Legal947 Words   |  4 PagesDefending Gay Marriage During the last few years, homosexuality has become an important issue for debate. Moreover, homosexuals have taken their case further by claiming their right to marry. Same-sex marriage, usually known as â€Å"gay marriage†, is the marriage between two people from the same biological sex (Doskow1). Since 2000, eleven countries have approved the legalization of gay marriage worldwide: Netherlands, Belgium, Spain, Canada, South Africa, Norway, Sweden, Portugal, Iceland, ArgentinaRead MoreGay Marriage Should Be Legal1480 Words   |  6 PagesNew World Dictionary defines the word married as being husband and wife, yet there are millions of gay activists who are fighting for a new meaning. They believe marriage is more than a piece of paper and a set of rings. The hope is that marriage could be defined as a â€Å"public recognition of a private commitment† or â€Å"emotional, financial, and psychological bond† between two people (Sullivan 53). Gay activists belie ve that taking away the ability to have a publicly recognized relationship or an acceptedRead MoreGay Marriage Should Be Legal1351 Words   |  6 Pageshappened for United States, gay marriage became legal in all 50 states. In most states it already was but the remaining 13 became legal this year. There are many concerns regarding gay marriage, and the effects of them involve many legislative, cultural, religious and family issues. Gay marriage is controversial because a lot of people do not approve of it, they think it is immoral, unnatural, and not what the traditional concept of â€Å"marriage† really means. Opponents of gay marriage say it is only meant

Police bruality essay for college class i guess - 1365 Words

Police Brutality Police brutality occurs daily across America. Police brutality can come in various forms, counting lethal and nonlethal force. Comprehending the exact commonness of police brutality is complex, because of the inconsistency in describing police brutality. The trouble in differentiating among justified and unjustified force. Police interactions often can be misconstrued, or sometimes turned around against an officer. Questionable behavior and complaints against officers can be filed by even the most violent of criminals. Often, the officer may restrain a potentially dangerous citizen, and be accused of excessive force. Overall, this results in not only a mark against the institution of law enforcement and the officer†¦show more content†¦For example, there was a strong negative reaction in the aftermath of the shooting of Oscar Grant in Oakland (2009) and the shooting of Shawn Bell in New York City (2006), and riots occurred after. Communities regularly react negatively to police brutality; urban communities nearly constantly respond negatively to police assaults of minorities. These actions hurt police-community dealings and can weaken citizens perceived respect for police authority. In some cases, the community also experiences the impact of police brutality on its victims. Citizens acquire majority of their info regarding police activity from the media. The media often present a slanted picture of the role of police to the public. When police brutality arises, it often appears in the media, receiving attention to the problem and inspiring reform. Eliminating police brutality from society is an apparently impossible mission, particularly if society gives police officers authority and discretion. Mass Media has a massive effect on police brutality; the types of actions that are brought on by police brutality brings negative media attention, further damaging the reputation of the police within society. An example of the power of the media exposure with police use of force can be seen in the Don t Taser Me Bro! incident from the University of Florida in 2004. Student Andrew Meyer was arrested during a

Team Ethics and Competitive Advantage †MyAssignmenthelp.com

Question: Discuss about the Team Ethics Competitive Advantage. Answer: Challenges: The case study under concern is observed in the LIBOR scandal faced by Barclays Plc and the review of the case study is intended to draw feasible inferences regarding the challenges vested in the case as well as possible recommendations to address the challenges. The recommendations could be based clearly on the comprehensive review of challenges pertaining to ethical leadership on the basis of different theoretical frameworks. First of all, the LIBOR scandal created the consequences of loss of trust among the market participants. Since the estimation of London Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR) is largely based on the trust and commitment among the large banks operating in international financial markets, the scandal presents formidable pitfalls leading to loss of trust in leadership (Rose Sesia, 2013). The comprehensive evaluation of the case study also provides viable insights into the challenge of competing functionally in a systemic market environment alongside addressing the concerns of widespread corruption (Srivastava, Franklin Martinette, 2013). Complicit involvement of regulators in presenting ambiguous implications associated with a corrupt system could also be accounted as a major challenge that can be identified in context of the LIBOR case study. Since the exchange rate is established on the grounds of involvement of the different large banks and in the concerned case study, the conspiracy involved unrequited reduction in LIBOR by Barclays for dealing with the financial crisis or to offset losses (Rose Sesia, 2013). The manipulation of LIBOR was considerably observed in derivative trade transactions. However, Barclays was not the sole perpetrator of the incident since 20 other banks were collectively involved in lowering the LIBOR rates thereby leading to profound red uction in the average LIBOR rates that was responsible for inducing formidable losses for investors. Therefore, the ethical concerns have to be reviewed from the perspective of potential reasons that could be observed as profound challenges for Barclays Plc to realise team ethics (Manroop, 2015). Barclays is subject to challenges regarding the LIBOR scandal due to the lack of precise estimation of group norms and avoidance of accountability. The lack of emphasis on the task at hand for the organization and its employees could be perceived as a major reason for imposing considerable ethical pitfalls (Matava, 2016). The aspects which must be taken into consideration in context of the task significance in teams involve the core dimensions associated with a job, critical psychological issues and the personal as well as professional outcomes associated with the task (Petersen, Pavlidis Semendeferi, 2014). The core job dimensions are observed profoundly in terms of identity of the task and significance of the task in the organizational context. The critical psychological issues such as information regarding the potential outcomes as well as experiencing responsibility for the professional outcomes are also involved as inherent factors describing the precedents leading to ethical d iscrepancies (Rose Sesia, 2013). The interpretation of McClellands theory of motivation could prove to be a viable explanation of the challenges encountered by Barclays with respect to the LIBOR scandal. The necessity for achievement could be observed as a major reason for the promotion of unethical practices such as lowering of the LIBOR rates (Siedel Haapio, 2016). Leadership issues identified in the case study could be reviewed with respect to the scope of destructive leadership (Strand Freeman, 2015). The validation for destructive leadership could be observed in the instability of monitoring frameworks and the existence of a culture that promotes toxic leadership. Destructive leadership is also characterized by the preferences of leaders to emphasize on their self (Rose Sesia, 2013). The CEO of Barclays, Robert Diamond had to resign from his post due to the action taken by British regulators albeit with his profound indications towards the reprehensible action taken by different team members which indicates another challenge regarding team ethics (Srivastava, Franklin Martinette, 2013). Recommendations: The recommendations which could be used to address the team ethics challenges and the cheating implications presented by Barclays Plc and its associated employees can be derived from the concerns of addressing team norms and values. The formation of team ethics served as a major pitfall in context of the cases observed ethical limitations thereby leading to considerable losses for investors (Siedel Haapio, 2016). The organization should consider the foremost recommendation of involvement with authorities and agencies that consider penalisation of banks for unethical activities. However, from a critical perspective the issue poses sustain possibilities of the banks manipulating LIBOR rates according to their interests. The consideration of another recommendation is observed in favouring transparency in the activities of the banking sector. The central authorities and banks could work in coordination to present transparent reports which would be validated on the grounds of individual audits conducted at each bank in the market environment (Wise, 2014). It is also imperative to consider the appointment of an independent regulatory body that could be accounted for monitoring the operations of the regulatory bodies involved with the banks. The outcomes which could be derived from such recommendations would be observed in the working of the regulatory bodies with explicit diligence following the precedents established for the exchange rates. The LIBOR rates could be associated with profound references to addressing the concerns of forced manipulation in the banking sector. The central authorities could consider the appointment of personal executives in large banks where the functions of the banks can be monitored effectively. The executives should consider reporting the unwarranted activities of banks noted in changes in financial position of banks comprising of references to the reduction in trading rates. Another potential recommendation that could help Barclays t o recover from the notable incident of LIBOR case would be to improve its public image as an ethical organization based on credible values. The positive outcomes that can be rendered by opting for initiatives such as a public relations campaign which would help the company to gather back the trust of stakeholders. Stakeholder approach has been a major theoretical highlight which proved to be successful in resolution of profound ethical scandals. The stakeholders such as investors could be assured of the companys validity as an ethical service provider through communicating the appointment of new executives and employees. This would enable stakeholders to perceive a contrasting change in organizational structure thereby contributing to the resolution of the challenges encountered by Barclays in response to the LIBOR scandal. Solution: Barclays has to finalize on a specific solution that would enable them to revise the flaws in team ethics. The concerns faced by Barclays could be profoundly addressed on the grounds of an understanding of self as well as others. The stakeholder approach and the implementation of a rational decision making process could serve as prolific attributes in the solution for the case study of Barclays. Stakeholder theory implies managers to ensure addressing the needs of a wide assortment of stakeholders by paying considerable attention to their requirements. Furthermore, the stakeholder approach would enable Barclays to address the ethical concerns related to employees, investors, community and other banks. Another significant highlight of the stakeholder approach is observed in the implications of moral standards, bribery, fair trade and human rights. The rational decision making model would enable the bank to ensure decision making through a group approach according to Schein. The possib le methods which could be used to frame the solution of Barclays case would involve authority rule imposed by central monitoring authorities, consensus and groupthink. The implications of groupthink would enable the bank to override all inherent motives through unanimity to prefer alternative courses of action that can benefit the cohesive group of banks. References Rose, C.S. and Sesia, A., 2013. Barclays and the LIBOR Scandal. Manroop, L., 2015. Human resource systems and competitive advantage: An ethical climate perspective. Business Ethics: A European Review, 24(2), pp.186-204. Matava, M.J., 2016. Ethical considerations for analgesic use in sports medicine. Clinics in sports medicine, 35(2), pp.227-243. Petersen, A.M., Pavlidis, I. and Semendeferi, I., 2014. A quantitative perspective on ethics in large team science. Science and engineering ethics, 20(4), pp.923-945. Strand, R. and Freeman, R.E., 2015. Scandinavian cooperative advantage: The theory and practice of stakeholder engagement in Scandinavia. Journal of business ethics, 127(1), pp.65-85. Srivastava, M., Franklin, A. and Martinette, L., 2013. Building a sustainable competitive advantage. Journal of technology management innovation, 8(2), pp.47-60. Sagas, M. and Wigley, B.J., 2014. Gray area ethical leadership in the NCAA: The ethics of doing the wrong things right. Journal of Intercollegiate Sport, 7(1), pp.40-57. Siedel, G. and Haapio, H., 2016. Proactive law for managers: A hidden source of competitive advantage. CRC Press. Wagner III, J.A. and Hollenbeck, J.R., 2014. Organizational behavior: Securing competitive advantage. Routledge. Wise, S., 2014. Can a team have too much cohesion? The dark side to network density. European Management Journal, 32(5), pp.703-711.

Morality vs. Obedience free essay sample

Beliefs and knowledge are both dynamic concepts on all organizational levels of the human experience, from the individual to the global. Lets take for example the statement, â€Å"The Earth is flat. † Five hundred years ago, this statement was knowledge. Today, it’s knowledge that this statement is false. Knowledge changes based on the information and evidence available to us at any point in time. This is also true of beliefs but in a different way. When most of us were young, we believed in the Tooth Fairy. Why? Because someone told us she was real. However, this belief changed as we began to mature and rely more upon our own abilities to discern truth from fiction. Thus, we have established that both knowledge and belief are subjective but for different reasons. Belief requires no evidence, while knowledge requires evidence and/or experience. I would now like to make a comparative argument regarding morality and obedience. We will write a custom essay sample on Morality vs. Obedience or any similar topic specifically for you Do Not WasteYour Time HIRE WRITER Only 13.90 / page Simply put, morality is ‘doing what’s right, regardless of what anyone says’ and obedience is ‘doing what your told, regardless of what’s right. One can think of many examples regarding these concepts as they are defined but I will leave this to the reader’s imagination. There is a simple truth to defining obedience and morality in this manner that I find directly comparable to the examined quotation. Neither belief nor obedience require an individual or group to actively engage in an activity or thought process independently. There is no critical thinking involved and one must put their faith in the ‘rightness’ or ‘truth’ of another’s belief, knowledge or otherwise. Both knowledge and morality require active engagement. One cannot possess knowledge without having evidence to back it up and one cannot act morally without understanding what it is that makes a situation right or wrong in their eyes. This is especially true when acting morally requires someone to go against social norms or established laws. The point of this paper is to shed light on the fact that we are all responsible for ourselves to the extent that we can be. No one person can know everything about everything, so belief and obedience are often useful and easy fallbacks. For example, I don’t snowboard on black diamond slopes. This is not because I have knowledge of how hurt I will get but because I belief the sign posting and obediently board within my level to avoid possible injury. However, in every decision one makes there should be a component of knowledge and morality applied. In application to the snowboarding example, I know, from experience, that my snowboarding skills are not on par with a black diamond. I choose not to risk my health and the resources of first responders by making the moral decision to stay off of it, despite my desire to challenge myself.